Legal Opinion

Austin Rankin Corp. v. Cadillac Pool Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1967No. 6925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

Austin Rankin Corporation, a Texas corporation, sued Cadillac Pool Corporation, and General Pool Corporation, Illinois corporations doing business in the State of Texas without permits to do business in Texas, to cancel and rescind a contract of July 13, 1965, and recover $3,000.00 delivered by the plaintiff to defendants as the consideration for certain pool kits and accessories or, in the alternative to recover damages of $3,000.00 for breach of such contract. Upon a motion to dismiss filed by defendants alleging that they were not amenable to process issued by the courts of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Graham v. McCarty & BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Phillips v. the MacCabeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Abramowitz v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  2. Kulbeth v. WoolnoughtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  3. Omniplan, Inc. v. New America Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Stewart v. Walton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Speyer v. Continental Sports Cars, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API