Legal Opinion

Vann Tool Co. v. Grace

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1977No. 11216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Justice.

Vann Tool Company brought suit upon a contract against the Graces, who are nonresidents of New Mexico. Service of process was obtained by posting the summons at an address in Phoenix, Arizona. The defendants failed to appear and default judgment was entered in favor of Vann Tool. Subsequently the defendants entered an appearance and moved to set aside the judgment. They asserted that they were not “personally” served as required by § 21-3-16, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1975), more commonly known as the “long-arm statute,” and that the address where the summons was posted was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Koplin v. Thomas, Haab & BottsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Ziegler v. HodgesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Melfi v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Household Finance Corporation v. McDevittNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Williamson v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Josh Norris v. Garry CauseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Campbell v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. Campbell v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Moya v. Catholic Archdiocese of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Orme v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API