Legal Opinion
Koplin v. Thomas, Haab & Botts
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 21, 1966No. Gen. 50,636PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting the defendant’s motion to quash service of process.
Three New York brokers, Saul Lerner Co., Inc., Filer, Schmidt & Co. and Thomas, Haab & Botts, were personally served with summons in New York City, under sections 16 and 17 of the Civil Practice Act. (Ill Rev Stats, c 110, pars 16, 17 (1961).) They were made defendants in a qui tarn action for damages brought under Ill Rev Stats, ch 38, § 330 (1959) and ch 38, § 28-8 (1961). The complaint charged that during the years 1959 through 1962 the defendants were dealers in “put and call”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Sifers v. HorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Vencedor Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Gougler Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Lombard Brothers, Inc. v. General Asset Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Milton Margoles, M.D. v. Alida JohnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.