Legal Opinion

Orme v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1989No. 20167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges an order of the district court granting a motion to quash service of process upon an out-of-state defendant. For the reasons set forth below, we grant petitioner Brent Robert Orme’s petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to accept personal jurisdiction over the real party in interest, Jeffrey Kahn.

FACTS

On December 2, 1988, petitioner filed a complaint in the district court against three defendants, including Jeffrey Kahn. The complaint sought damages for various torts the defendants allegedly committed…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Galatz v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jarstad ex rel. Jarstad v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Aldabe v. AldabeNevada Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. OrmeNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Firouzabadi v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dobson v. DobsonNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  4. BMO Harris Bank v. WhittemoreNevada Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Dobson v. DobsonNevada Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API