Scholtes v. Signal Delivery Service, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.
Introduction
This action arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, based upon complete diversity of citizenship. On February 16, 1982, plaintiff, Edward Paul Scholtes, instituted this action against his former employer, Signal Delivery Service, Inc. (hereinafter “Signal”), and two of his former superiors, Jim Johnson and Chet Dickey.
Plaintiff contends that Signal entered into an oral employment contract with him, whereby plaintiff was to be employed indefinitely, except for good cause. Signal discharged plaintiff on or about April 25, 1980, allegedly…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. OxfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. American Greetings Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Johnson v. Kreiser's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Beverly Lucas v. Brown & Root, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.