Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wolanin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2009No. 2008-2098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, John Stanley Wolanin of Phoenix, Arizona, Attorney Registration No. 0051970, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1991. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we indefinitely suspend respondent’s license to practice law, based on findings that he misappropriated client funds and failed to respond appropriately during the investigation of this misconduct. We agree that respondent committed professional misconduct as found by the board and that an indefinite suspension is warranted.

{¶ 2} Relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. MaybaumOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. LarkinOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Van SickleOhio Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API