Legal Opinion

Hennekes v. Maupin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1963No. 9240 and 9241PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYounger, J.

The lengthy petition filed in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas can he summarized by stating that it is brought by the plaintiff individually and as president and a member of Lodge No. 105 of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc., against Maupin, Business Manager of Local Lodge 105, Jones, Chairman of the Executive Council Trial Committee of the International, and Grant, International Vice President of the International; the last two defendants being residents of Kansas City, Kansas. The petition alleges that plaintiff is president of such local, having been duly elected in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Union of Steam & Operating Engineers v. OwensOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Gallagher v. HarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Boblitt v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Finley v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 986 v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Lough v. Varsity Bowl, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wedemeyer v. U.S.S. F.D.R. (CV-42) Reunion Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Coke v. United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  5. Esquinance v. Polk County Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API