Legal Opinion

Boblitt v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1943No. 885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This appeal on questions of law and fact brought to this court for trial de novo an action *340which is in form one for an injunction, but in fact is to settle a dispute that has existed since 1911 between two local lodges or divisions, as they are called, of the Order of Railway Conductors of America, a voluntary labor organization (herein referred to as the O. R. C., or the Order). A division of O. R. C. usually consists of the conductors working on an operating division of a railroad system, and their seniority district usually coincides with the operating division.

The plaintiffs are five…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wedemeyer v. U.S.S. F.D.R. (CV-42) Reunion Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Hennekes v. MaupinOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Seligman v. Toledo Moving Pictures Operators Union, Local 228Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. State ex rel. Ohio High School Athletic Ass'n v. Judges of the Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API