Legal Opinion
Verizon Maryland, Inc. v. Global Naps, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 2, 2004No. 03-1448NO03-1449PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded in part, affirmed in part, and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:
This case arises from the regulatory scheme created by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act or Act), Pub.L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56, to promote competition in local telephone markets. It is now before us for the second time after a remand by the Supreme Court. The main question today is this: whether a federal court has…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Central Telephone Co. v. Sprint Communications Co. of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Iowa Network Services, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
- Montgomery County v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL NC. v. CanslerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.