Union Indemnity Co. v. Forgey & Hanson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hast, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). The opinion of the chancellor was correct. It is well settled that the law of the land- is a part of every contract. In other words, a statutory provision relating* to the subject-matter of a contract,' by operation of law, enters into and becomes a part of the contract. Robards v. Brown, 40 Ark. 423; Choctaw & Memphis Ry. Co. v. Sullivan, 70 Ark. 262, 68 S. W. 495; and Hill v. American Book Co., 171 Ark. 427, 285 S. W. 20. The contract between the Northern Construction Company and Monroe County Drainage District No. 2 for the construction of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Bonding Co. v. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Reiff v. Redfield School BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Robards v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Bank of FultonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bank of BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Holcomb v. American Surety CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Jack v. Craighead Rice Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Morley v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Big Rock Stone & Material Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Leslie Lumber & Supply Co. v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.