Legal Opinion
Holcomb v. American Surety Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 19, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
Fifty-three persons brought a joint action against the appellees to recover amounts due them for work and labor performed and material furnished one Clark, a contractor, who had the contract for making an improvement known as Drainage District No. 12 in Jackson County. Clark had executed a bond to the drainage district for its use and benefit as well as for the use and benefit of all persons who might furnish any labor or material for the principal under his contract, and it was upon this bond that the liability of the appellees was sought to be established. Suit was first instituted in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Bonding Co. v. MorrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Bank of FultonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bank of BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Oliver Construction Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Pierce Oil Corporation v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. Clyde H. SmithwickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- R.J. "Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, New JerseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Geyer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- H. B. Deal Company, Inc. v. Marlin, JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.