Legal Opinion
State v. Hameroff
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 27, 1994No. 2 CA-CV 94-0247PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Chief Judge.
This appeal is taken from the trial court’s ruling allowing a law firm to recover unpaid attorney’s fees as part of a judgment against the defendants in a civil action brought under the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act (the Act), A.R.S. §§ 44-1521 to 44-1534. Because we agree that the trial court erred in construing the applicable statutes to include the law firm, Lewis and Roca, in the distribution as a victim of consumer fraud and because no other authority supports distribution to it of any portion of the funds seized pursuant to the Act, we reverse.
The underlying facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peery v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Madsen Ex Rel. Corbin v. Western American Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. HovatterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Owen v. City Court of City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winkler v. DTE, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.