Legal Opinion

Active v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 9, 2007No. A-8984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Edward H. Active appeals his convictions for first-degree burglary, attempted first-degree sexual assault, and fourth-degree assault. Active argues that the trial judge improperly allowed the State to play (and the jury to hear) audio tapes of the victim's prior statements to a police investigator. Active also argues that the trial judge improperly allowed the State to introduce evidence of Active's 1998 conviction for second-degree sexual assault (involving another victim). Finally, Active argues that he was sentenced in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to jury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Brown v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Donlun v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Michael GreerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Pearl E. Dilley, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen D. Dilley, Deceased v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  2. Charles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  4. Con Lysle Compton v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API