Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Valenzuela-Arisqueta

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2013No. 12-10596PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

Victor Manuel Valenzuela-Arisqueta (“Valenzuela”) appeals from the district court’s rejection of his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the country in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He asserts that the rejection of his plea violates his constitutional right against double jeopardy. We determine that the underlying premise for Valenzuela’s insistence that the district court accept his plea — that the maximum sentence under the indictment was two years’ incarceration — is wrong. Furthermore, because Valenzuela was not informed of the possible 20-year sentence, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Darrel Duane GriselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. People v. GuillenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. (HC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Fernando Allen Sanchez v. County of San Diego, by and through its Health & Human Services Agency (HHSA); et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API