United States v. Victor Valenzuela-Arisqueta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Victor Manuel Valenzuela-Arisqueta (“Valenzuela”) appeals from the district court’s rejection of his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the country in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He asserts that the rejection of his plea violates his constitutional right against double jeopardy. We determine that the underlying premise for Valenzuela’s insistence that the district court accept his plea — that the maximum sentence under the indictment was two years’ incarceration — is wrong. Furthermore, because Valenzuela was not informed of the possible 20-year sentence, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Darrel Duane GriselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- People v. GuillenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- (HC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Superior CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Armis Arrendondo v. Dwight NevenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fernando Allen Sanchez v. County of San Diego, by and through its Health & Human Services Agency (HHSA); et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.