Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 31, 1941No. Claim No. 24383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

This claim arises out of the Elmira Grade Crossing Elimination. Claimants demand damages according to paragraph 11 of their claim in four particulars, viz.:(1) For value of land appropriated and taken. This item was dismissed at the close of the claimants’ case because no land was appropriated or taken.(2) For damages to real property of claimants not so appropriated. We make an allowance on this item in the amount of $1,500 for obstruction to and interference with the easements of light, air and access to claimants’ property over and above all benefits resulting from the elimination of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Mirro v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. West 358th Street Garage Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Champion Oil Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cook v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API