Legal Opinion
Champion Oil Co. v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided October 10, 1936No. Claim No. 24197PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
This claim is the first case to be submitted to this court under chapter 825 of the Laws of 1928, known as the Syracuse Grade Crossing Elimination Act. Claimant’s property abuts on Riegel street and lies between Beach and Vine streets in the city of Syracuse. Riegel street was closed by the Syracuse commission. A nineteen-foot embankment was constructed therein and .upon this the railroad tracks were placed. This completely cut off access to claimant’s lands although no part thereof was taken.
Claimant sues pursuant to section 9 of the act, which reads: “ If the work of such elimination causes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Askey & Hager, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Askey Hager, Inc. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People Ex Rel. Janes v. . DickeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Dwornik v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1934
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mirro v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Knights v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936
- Caldwell & Ward Brass Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1936
- Solkat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
- Columbia Machine Works, Inc. v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.