State v. Oxendine
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
*503 Defendant Roger Christopher Oxendine appeals from his convictions of manufacturing methamphetamine and possessing precursors to methamphetamine. On appeal, defendant contends that the indictment's language was insufficient because (1) with respect to the possession of methamphetamine precursors count, it failed to allege defendant's intent to use the precursors to manufacture or his knowledge that they would be used to manufacture methamphetamine; and (2) with respect to the manufacturing methamphetamine count, the indictment relied on defendant's possessing precursors as the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. LenoirCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.