Legal Opinion

State v. Saiz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1988No. 15928PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Rosendo Saiz, appeals his conviction on various drug charges. We affirm.

In January, 1987, the Butte County Sheriff and State’s Attorney received information from a confidential informant that defendant had possession of one-half ounce of cocaine. According to the informant, the drugs would either be on defendant’s person, in his red Chevrolet pickup, or in his Belle Fourche trailer home.

The sheriff and the state’s attorney prepared affidavits in support of a search warrant. The sheriff’s affidavit described the place to be searched and the items to be seized…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. GoldstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. SleepSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. ShearerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. DodsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API