State v. Boll
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] William James Boll was convicted of unauthorized manufacture of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation of SDCL 22-42-2 and SDCL 22-42-5.1 He appeals contending that the trial court erred in deny*713ing his motion to suppress the evidence seized at his home and on his person. That evidence was seized pursuant to a search warrant. However, the affidavit supporting the warrant contained some information obtained from a prior illegal search. After redacting all information derived directly and indirectly…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DeneuiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.