Legal Opinion
United States v. William Frederick Geittmann, Jr. And David Robert Zamansky, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1984No. 83-2064, 83-2066PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
Involved herein are the appeals of David Zamansky and William Geittmann from convictions on federal drug charges. The cases have been consolidated on appeal but they must be considered separately here, because they are different, as will be seen.
I. APPEAL OF ZAMANSKY
Zamansky was charged in a seven count indictment with conspiracy and drug smuggling charges. There was a plea bargain and he entered a plea of guilty, to a single charge, use of the telephone to facilitate a conspiracy to smuggle marijuana into the United States.
The United States District Court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Miguel A. Espinoza v. J.W. Fairman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Anthony TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John C. Hudson, Larry Baresel, and Jack Butler RackleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John H. Migliaccio, United States of America v. Bert M. AveryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.