Legal Opinion
United States v. John C. Hudson, Larry Baresel, and Jack Butler Rackley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1994No. 93-6117, 93-6123 and 93-6125PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants John Hudson, Larry Baresel and Jack Rackley were indicted in August 1992 for criminal law violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 656 and 1005 because of their alleged mismanagement and illegal operation of several banks. These violations were based on the same lending transactions which were the subject of prior administrative sanctions imposed against the Appellants by the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) for violations of various federal banking laws.
Each Appellant moved to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds. The United States District Court for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- George Earl Larson v. Robert Tansy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.