Legal Opinion
Georges v. Rajnarine
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Wade, J.), entered July 27, 1999, as, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability finding it 60% at fault in the happening of the accident, the defendants Winston Rajnarine and Ravin Rajnarine 30% at fault, and the plaintiff Wilguerson Georges 10% at fault, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Miller v. FernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Eisenberg v. Village of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kramer v. LagneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Lear v. AlvaradoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Ortiz v. PinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- O'Connor v. Ronnie Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016