Legal Opinion
Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 1988PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified not answered as unnecessary. In view of the undisputed evidence that a direct safe route to the bus was available to plaintiff, the bus company may not be held liable for plaintiff’s injuries (see, MacKenzie v Union Ry. Co., 82 App Div 124, affd 178 NY 638).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacKenzie v. . Union Railway Company of New York CityNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- MacKenzie v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by55 opinions
- Miller v. FernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Mahase v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Burton v. Des Moines Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Elmaliach v. Bank of China Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Kelleher v. F.M.E. Auto Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.