Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Putman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 3, 2006No. AC 26685PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiff, Christopher Kennedy, appeals pro se from the denial of his application for a restraining order against the defendant, Leanna Put-man, 1 made pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-15. 2 The plaintiff claims that the trial court’s decision was contrary to the evidence presented at the hearing and that it failed to accommodate his disability, attention deficit disorder, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. We dismiss the appeal as moot. 3
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the disposition of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Putman v. KennedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Jones v. RickerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- In re Jeffrey C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- In re Jeffrey C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Small v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Lopez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Anderson v. DikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. WILLIAM C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Pryor v. PryorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.