Legal Opinion

Scott v. Maier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiffs, who -are a firm of architects, sued defendant for services in preparing drawings for a proposed building,’ and recovered a verdict for one per cent, of the amount which they estimated the proposed building would cost ($17,000), making their commission $170. Thej) was brought before any set of plans and specifications had^suit been completed, and before defendant had ascertained or determined in what style and manner he would build, or at what expense. The declaration being on the common counts, particulars were demanded, and were as follows: “To services rendered as architects and…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Keeter v. State Ex Rel. Saye, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Park v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  4. La Grande National Bank v. BlumOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Magic Packing Co. v. Stone-Ordean Wells Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API