Legal Opinion

Premier Graining Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 27, 1966No. C.D. 2721Published

1Opinion of the Court

BiohaRdsoN, Judge:

The merchandise of these consolidated protests is described on the invoices as “Zinc-Sheets in la lithographic quality for Offset Printing, raw, unfinished,” which is shipped in rectangular flat shapes of various sizes and dimensions including the size 26% by 31 inches by ^ooo of an inch. This merchandise, of West German origin, was entered at Chicago and New York, and classified in liquidation as manufactures of zinc, not specially provided for, under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1001, paragraph 391 (paragraph '397, Tariff Act of 1930), as modified in T.D. 54108, and assessed with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Seligmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Stengel v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Langerman & Petty v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API