Legal Opinion
Chiro-Med Review Company v. Bureau of Workers'compensation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2006No. 2478 C.D. 2005, No. 2570 C.D. 2005Published
1Opinion of the Court
908 A.2d 980 (2006)
Chiro-Med Review Company, Petitioner
v.
Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Respondent
Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Petitioner
v.
Chiro-Med Review Company, Respondent
No. 2478 C.D. 2005, No. 2570 C.D. 2005.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Submitted: June 16, 2006.
Filed: September 28, 2006.
BEFORE: SMITH-RIBNER, Judge; SIMPSON, Judge; FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.
OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON
The novel issue here is whether a Bureau of Workers' Compensation (Bureau) Hearing Officer may compensate a Utilization Review Organization (URO) for the Bureau's improper revocation of authorization…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Powell v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Stackhouse v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Fawber v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Adair v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.