Gray v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This habeas appeal concerns the validity of the petitioner’s claim that his conviction for manslaughter should be set aside because his nolo contendere plea resulted from the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. The habeas court concluded that, although trial counsel had misled the petitioner, and although the habeas judge personally had doubts about the petitioner’s guilt, the petitioner had failed to establish that there was a reasonable probability that, if the petitioner had gone to trial, the result would have been different. See Hill v. Lockhart,, 474 U.S. 52, 57-58, 106…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Woods v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Rivera v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4Cited by6 opinions
- Gray v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Sanchez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Georges v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Gray v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Gray v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.