Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Amundson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2005No. CCV 0206127; A122866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in a quiet title action that awarded plaintiffs specific performance of a contract to sell a house. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in granting specific performance because (1) plaintiffs breached the contract; (2) plaintiffs revoked and rescinded the contract; or (3) plaintiffs’ claim is barred by laches. We affirm.

In November 1994, defendant 1 and plaintiffs signed a “Sale Agreement and Receipt for Earnest Money.” The document provided that plaintiffs agreed to purchase defendant’s house for $275,000

“on the following terms: Earnest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Clarno v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mitchell v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Johnson v. BernsOregon Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tech 7 Systems, Inc. v. Vacation Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  2. Phoenix-Talent School District 4 v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Schipper Construction, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tech 7 Systems, Inc. v. Vacation Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API