Legal Opinion

Phoenix-Talent School District 4 v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 2009No. 052105E2, A134433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendants Hamilton and Thirkill appeal from a limited judgment for plaintiff Phoenix-Talent School District #4 (district) on the district’s claim for specific performance of an agreement to purchase real property from defendants and from a supplemental judgment awarding attorney fees to the district. Defendants assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment and to the granting of the district’s cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons explained herein, we reverse the judgments for the district and remand for entry of judgment for defendants.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Dan Bunn, Inc. v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Vision Realty, Inc. v. KohlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. RIVERSIDE HOMES, INC. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Phoenix-Talent School District 4 v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. McBride v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Lee Pacific Properties, Inc. v. Century Pacific Equity Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. RIVERSIDE HOMES, INC. v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API