Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. San Pedro Boat Works

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2011No. 08-56163PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

This case calls on us to determine, in the first instance, whether the holder of a revocable permit to use real property is an “owner” of that real property for purposes of imposing liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for the cleanup of hazardous substances disposed on that property by others. A common sense reading of the statute and existing state law persuade us that this permittee, as the holder of a possessory interest, cannot be such an “owner” under CERCLA, and we so hold.

The City of Los Angeles…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Chubb Custom Insurance Company v. Space Systems/ Loral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. Youssif Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Family Pac v. Rob McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. NetApp, Inc. v. Nimble Storage, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API