Legal Opinion

Hauer, Admr. v. French Bros.-Bauer Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1931No. 3933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The trial court granted a motion for non-suit presumably on the proposition of failure of proof of the cause of the injury and, or the assumption of risk by decedent.

Under §1027 GC, sub-section 1, the defendant, The French Bros. Bauer Company owed the duty to case or box all shafting located horizontally near the floors. This it failed to do, and this failure constituted negligence.

Under the provisions of §871-13 sub-section 5, and §871-15, §871-16, GC, the defendant, The French Bros. Bauer Company owed this duty to the decedent, for the reason that he was a frequenter on the premises and not…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Troop a Riding Academy v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Baker v. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Justice v. Shelby Ice & Fuel Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Vitaro v. C. W. & P. Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API