Legal Opinion

Troop a Riding Academy v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1934No. 24239PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.

The contentions of the plaintiff in error may be reduced to two:(1) That there was no evidence upon which the jury might properly base a verdict for the plaintiff.(2) That the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury as specially requested by the defendant.

Was there any evidence to go to the jury? The claim of the plaintiff below that the defendant was guilty of fault or negligence rested entirely upon two circumstances; namely, that the horse upon being ridden into the arena persistently moved his head up and down and sidewise, and that the groom, Clark, told the plaintiff, after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Benjamin v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Twigg v. RylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Copeland v. DraperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Phillips v. DewaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Mateas v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  5. Evans v. UpmierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API