Legal Opinion

Joseph v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1991No. 88-1139PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Joseph was indicted on charges of assault with intent to kill while armed 1 and carrying a pistol without a license. 2 After a jury trial, he was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon 3 (as a lesser included offense of assault with intent to kill while armed) and carrying a pistol without a license. 4 On appeal Joseph contends that the government constructively amended the first count of the indictment in such a way that he was convicted of an offense with which he had not been charged by the grand jury. He also argues that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Richardson, BillyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Burgess v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Matthews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API