Hitchcock v. Cosper
Indiana Supreme Court
From Noble Circuit Court; Emmet A. Bratton, Special Judge. Action by Emeline K. Cosper against Don K. Hitchcock. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under subdivision 2, §1337] Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10, subd. 2.
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.
This action was prosecuted by appellee to recover $340, with interest thereon. The complaint avers substantially the following facts: The defendant is, and has been since 1884, a son-in-law of the plaintiff. ■ On and prior to November 30, 1892, the relations between plaintiff and defendant were “close and confidential.” During said time the defendant was plaintiff’s confidential adviser in regard to her business affairs. He loaned and collected her money, transacted other business, and was, as averred, “trustee and business agent.” About three weeks prior to said November 30, he received from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- Newsom v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Estate of Stanley v. PenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Raymond v. SimonsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunter v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Dean v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Rickes v. RickesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Taber v. ZehnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Buckel v. AuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.