Farwell v. Farwell

Two issues are raised on this appeal. They are:

1. Is the plaintiff wife a fit and proper person to have custody of the minor children of the parties ?

*3272. Did the trial court abuse its discretion by awarding $500 per mo^th for the support of the minor children ?

A preliminary question is raised by plaintiff Roberta Farwell who, relying on Auto Acceptance & Loan Corp. v. Taus (1965), 28 Wis. (2d) 496, 137 N. W. (2d) 452, challenges the right of defendant Gail Farwell to relief on this appeal as plaintiff contends defendant failed to move for a review of the judgment pursuant to sec. 269.46 (3),…