Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Blakely

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 1999No. WCB 97-0529M; CA A101506Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Petitioners, an employer and its insurer, seek review of an “own motion” order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, ORS 656.278, awarding claimant temporary disability benefits. ORS 656.210. They assert that the Board’s determination that claimant was willing to work, which is a prerequisite to the receipt of such benefits, was not supported by the evidence on which the Board relied. We agree and, consequently, reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimant sought temporary disability compensation benefits, pursuant to the Board’s own motion authority,1 as a result of arthroscopic knee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Dawkins v. Pacific Motor TruckingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. KepfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API