Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Harrington

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1961No. Civ. 6472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants in a damage action arising out of an automobile collision. The appeal has been taken on a settled engrossed statement, under rule 7(a), Rules on Appeal, which includes only a brief reference to the purpose of the action as pleaded; the transcript of testimony of each of the automobile drivers involved; plaintiff’s Exhibits 1 through 5, consisting of photographs of the scene and of the cars involved, 6A, 6B and 7; and defendants’ Exhibits A to J, inclusive, consisting of X-ray photo negatives, hospital records, and income tax…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Callahan v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bell v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Health First v. March Joint Powers AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Richardson v. OliveriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API