Legal Opinion

Henriksen v. Younglove Construction

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 22, 1995No. 94-1418PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Appellant, Arthur J. Henriksen, was injured on a job site in Nebraska while working for his Iowa employer, Younglove Construction, appellee. The industrial commissioner dismissed Henriksen’s petition for Iowa workers’ compensation benefits, concluding that Iowa had no jurisdiction of Hen-riksen’s claim even though Henriksen was domiciled in Iowa. The district court upheld this determination. We think Henriksen’s Iowa domicile was sufficient under Iowa Code section 85.71(1) (1989) to confer subject matter jurisdiction upon the Iowa industrial commissioner. Therefore, we reverse.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Voss v. State, Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. IBP, Inc. v. HarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Miller v. Westfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API