Legal Opinion

Page v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1951No. 47171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

Plaintiffs,, a partnership composed of Holland Page and Sherman Nelson, sue to recover $210,620.12, the amount to which they say they are entitled under, and because of a breach of their contract for the clearing of certain acreage in the Norfork Eeservoir area in northern Arkansas and southern Missouri.

Bids were invited for clearing six different areas, designated areas 2, 3,4,5, 6 and 7, both separately and as a whole. These areas were within the area of the reservoir to be created by the erection of a dam on the North Fork Biver. One of the plaintiffs, Sherman Nelson, bid on all six…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Modern Industrial Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  2. John M. Whelan & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  3. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Collins ex rel. Waldrop Heating & Plumbing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tester Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  2. BMY-Combat Systems Division of Harsco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API