Modern Industrial Bank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge
Plaintiff, as assignee of John Post & Son Corporation, brought this suit to recover $18,090.99 for work done by its assignor under a construction contract with defendant prior to the date on which the Government terminated the contractor’s right to further proceed with the work under art. 9 of the contract.
Plaintiff’s first contention is that the action of the Government in terminating the contractor’s right to proceed on October 14,1941, was not justified and, therefore, constitutes a breach of the contract. We cannot agree. The contractor was in default on September 1, 1941 (all dates…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- National City Bank of Evansville v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.