Legal Opinion

Modern Industrial Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1944No. 45602PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

Plaintiff, as assignee of John Post & Son Corporation, brought this suit to recover $18,090.99 for work done by its assignor under a construction contract with defendant prior to the date on which the Government terminated the contractor’s right to further proceed with the work under art. 9 of the contract.

Plaintiff’s first contention is that the action of the Government in terminating the contractor’s right to proceed on October 14,1941, was not justified and, therefore, constitutes a breach of the contract. We cannot agree. The contractor was in default on September 1, 1941 (all dates…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. United States v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  2. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. National City Bank of Evansville v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API