Legal Opinion

DiNubile v. Kent

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1976No. 529PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Kendall H. Shoyer 1 2was reelected judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia on November 6, 1973, and began his new term on January 7, 1974. He reached the age of seventy on November 24, 1974, and was retired as required by article V, section 16(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Appellant sought a declaratory judgment in the Commonwealth Court claiming that he was entitled to receive benefits under section 401(4) of the State Employees’ Retirement Code of 1959 (hereinafter section 401(4)) 2 The court determined that appellant is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Liquor Control Board v. KusicCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. DiNubile v. KentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ardolino v. City of Pittsburgh Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Barbieri v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Barbieri v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Fordyce Food Distributors v. Valley Innkeeper, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1982
  5. In re Genna, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API