Legal Opinion

Liquor Control Board v. Kusic

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1973No. Appeal, No. 793 C.D. 1972 (consolidated for argument with 800 C.D. 1972)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This case raises the novel question as to whether or not an Assistant Attorney General may appeal to this Court on behalf of an administrative agency despite the fact the agency concerned has advised him that it does not wish to proceed with the appeal.

This action began when Gloria Kusic (Kusic) filed an application with the Liquor Control Board (Board) to transfer her Restaurant Liquor License from Mc-Keesport to a location in White Oak Borough. Following a hearing, the Board refused the transfer and Kusic appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. That…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. GelderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. York v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. HitchlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. DiNubile v. KentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. White Oak Borough v. KusicCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Frantz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. San Gerónimo Caribe Project, Inc. v. ARPESupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API