Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2008No. Civil 04-1609 (EGS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Eugene Johnson brings this complaint against the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) alleging discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) for alleged race, age and sex discrimination related to his employment with the Office of Budget and Program Analysis (“OBPA”). Defendant USDA now moves for dismissal or, in the alternative, summary judgment. Upon consideration of the motions, responses, and replies…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schmidt v. ShahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Howard v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Abou-Hussein v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Johnson v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.