Legal Opinion
Willard Oil Co. v. Riley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 21, 1911No. 1834PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Error from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Joseph Riley and the United Oil Company against the Willard Oil Company. From an order appointing a receiver for the defendant, it brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This case presents an appeal from an order of the district court of Rogers county appointing a receiver, on the prayer of appellees and defendants in error, of the appellant and plaintiff in error, the Willard Oil Company. The statute under which the receiver was appointed is section 5772, Comp. Raws of Oklahoma of 1909, and the portion pertinent to our investigation reads as follows:
“A receiver may be appointed by. the Supreme Court, the district court, or any judge of either, or in the absence of said judges from the county, by the probate judge: First, in an action by a vendor to vacate a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bain v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Waldron v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Male v. DahlgrinNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Brien v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wagoner Oil & Gas Co. v. MarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Vilbig Const. Co. v. WhithamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.