Legal Opinion
Vilbig Const. Co. v. Whitham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 26, 1944No. 31398PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The plaintiffs in error, defendants below, Vilbig Construction Company, a corporation, and J. Lee and E. A. Vilbig, Inc., a corporation, appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate the appointment of a receiver pen-dente lite for certain jointly owned properties in possession of said defendants and acquired in connection with a construction project in which the plaintiff and defendants were jointly interested.
The defendants are affiliated corporations, having their offices at Dallas, Tex., and are engaged in the construction business, their principal business being grading and paving…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Willard Oil Co. v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kaufman v. CatzenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
- Blackstock Oil Co. v. CastonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Eason Oil Co. v. Oklahoma City Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Boynton Gas & Electric Co. v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frankfort Oil Company, a Division of Carstairs Bros. Distilling Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. W. F. SnakardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Britton v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- DEPT. OF SECURITIES EX REL. FAUGHT v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Vilbig Const. Co. v. WhithamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Darrell D. Parks, Carl T. Ramsey and Phillips Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. Riverside Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.