Legal Opinion

National Bank of Holly Hill v. Hair

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1942No. 15401PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Bonham :

This action involves a mortgage upon a certain tract of land in Orangeburg County, executed by Edgar D. Sasportas to the Edisto National Bank of Orangeburg, South Caroina, dated April 9, 1918, and duly recorded on April 12, 1918, securing a note of the same date as the mortgage in the principal sum of $1,083.00 maturing one year after date. In due course the mortgage and note were acquired by assignment by the appellant herein.

The original complaint in this action alleged that the said E- D. Sasportas has died, leaving as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashe v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Montague v. SteltsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  3. Vallentine v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Glymph v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Region Industrial Realty, Inc. v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Bell v. City of AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. McCutchen v. HinnantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API