Legal Opinion

Bell v. City of Anderson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1954No. 16921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

The respondent in this appeal recovered verdict and judgment in tort against appellant perforce section 47-71 of the Code of 1952, the concluding provisions of which follow:

“Before any action shall be brought hereunder a claim duly certified shall be filed with such municipal corporation within three months after the date of such injury or damage or action commenced within such time on a verified complaint. If such verified claim be filed within the time herein fixed an action shall be commenced within one year from the date of filing thereof or such cause of action shall…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. MacRi v. FlahertyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1953
  3. Pearson v. Newton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Jeff Hunt MacHinery Co. v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. National Bank of Holly Hill v. HairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Pinkston v. MorrallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API