Legal Opinion

Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 18, 1932No. 13517PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran.

It seems difficult for this case to find a landing field. It was commenced in the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County where it was first tried, resulting in a directed verdict for the defendants. Upon appeal to this Court, the judgment was reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial. 162 S. C., 281, 160 S. E., 843. Up to this time no difficulties had.arisen. After argument in this Court and pending the decision, the defendant R. E. Montague, a resident of Charleston County, died, and, it being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riddle v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  2. Barfield v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Hodge v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. City of Sumter v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Tucker v. IngramSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Rosamond v. Lucas-Kidd Motor Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Hancock v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Shelton v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API