Legal Opinion
Contreras v. Blue Cross of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1988No. B012211PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, Acting P. J.
Numerous plaintiffs brought this action, basically for wrongful discharge, against defendants Blue Cross of California and others. Due to a procedural quirk, this matter is before us on appeal even though the practical effect of the challenged order was to permit plaintiffs to file a first amended complaint, which is not ordinarily an appealable order, and even though the first amended complaint has apparently been superseded by a subsequent amended complaint.
The appeal arose this way: A demurrer to the original complaint was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Blakey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Harding v. CollazoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Johnson v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berman v. BrombergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Huh v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Minick v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Lim v. The.Tv Corp. InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- HUH v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.